|
Post by Murfios on Dec 5, 2006 20:51:15 GMT
How are we goin to get a narrator¿?
|
|
|
Post by Filibusteria on Dec 5, 2006 21:06:22 GMT
Good, we will have historicall battles, but we need for that a working campaign game ! ;D But we will make no harm if we define what battles will they be, are we?
|
|
|
Post by caiusf on Dec 6, 2006 16:58:34 GMT
Good, we will have historicall battles, but we need for that a working campaign game ! ;D Not nessesary
|
|
|
Post by SSJVegetaTrunks on Dec 6, 2006 21:06:03 GMT
What?
|
|
|
Post by caiusf on Dec 6, 2006 21:36:27 GMT
They were saying something about the campaign map and the historical battles and they are two different things...
|
|
|
Post by SSJVegetaTrunks on Dec 6, 2006 21:41:32 GMT
Yeah, I think that they mean that before we start working on making historical battle, we need a working campaign since people don't get a mod to play the historical battles. They are just a bonus.
|
|
|
Post by ByzantineKnight on Dec 7, 2006 1:25:58 GMT
Yeah, I think that they mean that before we start working on making historical battle, we need a working campaign since people don't get a mod to play the historical battles. They are just a bonus. They could be in a Pre-Beta Release without campaign, kinda like M2TW did...
|
|
|
Post by Filibusteria on Dec 7, 2006 1:54:41 GMT
Yeah, I think that they mean that before we start working on making historical battle, we need a working campaign since people don't get a mod to play the historical battles. They are just a bonus. They could be in a Pre-Beta Release without campaign, kinda like M2TW did... So, why don't we have two of them planned, just for having one less problem for finishing the mod? Sometimes doing small things first saves times and energy, for the important things to be done... We could use the one i posted ;D, and one that antarki posted...
|
|
|
Post by ByzantineKnight on Dec 7, 2006 2:27:20 GMT
Sure
|
|